A
FEW WEEKS WITH THE NEW MACBOOK PRO
|
tuesday,
11 november 2008
|
Yes, I could not resist
the siren song of the shiny, new "unibody" notebooks
released by Apple on Tuesday. I had gone for just about four
and a half years without a machine upgrade, running on my very
dependable but increasingly not-state-of-the-art 12-inch PowerBook
G4. Without an external screen might I add.
Yes, nearly everything
I've done, including this website and all of the artwork
on it, was built on that small screen with
that small processor, in spite of the fact that much of the
work was intended to be produced and seen at much larger
sizes. Sparky (so named to extend the "lightning" theme,
you understand) has been an absolute trooper and, frankly,
runs as well as the day I bought it (better, in fact, since
I swapped out the original 60GB drive for a 7200 rpm 100GB
drive about a year and a half ago). I have no intention of
retiring the machine, or selling it, or packing it away.
I now consider it to be a Mac Ultraportable and a very capable
music server, or emergency backup or whatever. Apple did
not
skimp on its capabilities back in 2004 and it still stacks
up well to new machines in its size category.
So Sparky will
be around for quite some time, I think. (I
should let you know that at this point the fawning really
starts, so if you keep reading don't say I didn't warn
you.)
To say that the new MacBook Pro is an upgrade for me is to
understate the matter by an order of magnitude or two. It could
well be argued that the last design generation (as opposed
to performance generation) of Apple aluminum portables was
the most successful notebook design
in the history
of computers.
That stamped aluminum case, that shape, that look, that
grainy silver finish, has been around and looking sharp
for over
5 years (going back, virtually unchanged, all the way
to
the
PowerBook G4 days as it did), an unheard-of eon in computer
design years. But at no point was it ever considered
dated. In fact I think one of the reasons it was so successful
for so long is that no one could imagine how one would
go about
improving on such a clean, workable design. It just kept
looking better than anything else year after year. And
recently that
very design was still outselling just about everything
else on
the market.
And so now we come to the new machine. If
the "current" one
still looks modern and effective, the "new" one
looks like it's been transported to our time from the
future. A future
where things just hold themselves together without
seams or screws or latches, and the lines and curves
are so
clean you
just think, "Well, that looks good, but no one
will ever really build that."
And when you actually
see one, and you hold it and turn it and weigh it in
your hands the thing feels
like a
single, solid piece of ... something. If design was
a substance
and
could
be alloyed with technology to produce an actual material,
that's what Apple has used to pour the new MacBook
Pro into existence (see the fawning? I did warn you).
Now, I understand the person who
says that this is all a bit overkill. It's nice that Apple
puts this
much thought
into
design and all, but is it really that big of a deal?
Wouldn't it be good just to have a good looking machine
that did
more
things, or that did them faster?
But this complaint
is as old as Apple itself. The modern era of this kind of
grousing goes back to
the original
iMac – all
translucent Bondi Blue plastic, USB ports and no
floppy drive. And it's just as valid or invalid
now as it was then. I'm
not dismissing
the criticism, but I am saying that Apple has always
considered the look and feel to be as important
a feature as the raw
functionality, because it has everything to do
with how a human interfaces
with the machine. Apple takes a very holistic approach
to design; they don't see it as just "making
something look good." It's
the way it allows a person to reach the function
of that machine as well, and the overall impression
that machine makes on its
owner, the affinity it engenders.
This new "unibody" production
process is not just about making a better-looking
machine. It's also about cleaning
up and streamlining the insides and the overall
structure. Air moves better through the interior.
The overall body is
stiffer and more solid. Fewer movable parts means
better dependability and fewer bits to worry about.
The overall impression is one
of a device that will do what you need it to do
for a long time without having to worry about it
much, an impression that
is very much the sort of thing Apple is all about.
There
are plenty of people who don't care a whit about such things,
and fair enough. Clearly this
is the sort
of thing
that impresses a guy like me, but partly because
I think I understand what Apple is shooting for
and why.
Maybe
it's because
I am a designer, but I appreciate the fact that
this "innovation" is
really in service of increased function, even
if that function isn't expressible as a higher
megahertz
or framerate.
My favorite Buckminster Fuller quote
is, “When I'm working
on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think
only how to solve the problem. But when I have
finished, if the solution
is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.”
Alright,
so much for the fit and finish; let's talk practicality.
I'm
apt to gloss over the speed and performance of the machine
in favor of more usability-oriented
concerns.
It's fast.
Just about everything it does seems instantaneous
to me. Launching
apps is fast, saving files is fast, loading
Web pages is fast. But I will be the first to admit
that mine
may
not
be the most
discerning opinion where all this is concerned;
my upgrade delta is pretty steep, so the difference
is pretty striking
to me. I don't time my processes. I don't clock
how
long it takes to launch Photoshop or save
a 400 MB file,
I don't
run framerate tests in a battery of games.
The numbers don't concern me, per se. Suffice to
say everything
feels super
snappy and I'm damn impressed with the way
World of Warcraft looks
and how solid it runs, even fullscreen on my
24" external
monitor.
There was a time, not too long ago,
that I could find a valid use for every last
ounce
of megahertz
and byte,
but
I'm no
longer a bleeding edge power user. I'm not
editing HD video or doing heavy CGI animations.
Large
Photoshop files and
some games are my upper limit.
The question I ask is, "Am I happy with how the machine
works while I'm using it?" The answer is a resounding,
nearly-unqualfied, yes.
Over the years of using the PowerBook, I developed
a couple of habits. I use a tablet much of
the time, so
I always
have to take the computer+tablet setup into
account. I've always
preferred to push my tablet up against the
right side of the notebook so the two are square
with
each other;
the
tablet stays oriented correctly and the arrangement
is easier to
manage.
One of the problems I've had with every other
Pro model Apple's put out in recent years was
the fact
that some
important
ports were arranged on the right, interfering
with my setup. So,
a simple thing like having all the ports on
the left now is one of my favorite things about
the
new MacBook
Pro.
It's a
bit of a trade-off, I know. It probably means
that there must be fewer port options (especially
on
the MacBook,
the loss
of FireWire has caused a lot of dust to be
kicked up; people aren't happy being corralled
into
change by
fewer options
even if, in the long run, it might be a better
set of options for
most people (and for Apple)).
For me, these
attenuated options are far less problematic
than they might be for others.
I don't need a port
for every occasion.
I have FireWire 800 drives for backups, a
FW400 pocketdrive (which a simple change of cable
makes usable). My
scanner and printer and other peripherals
are all USB. I've
been seeing
the writing on the wall for FireWire as a
consumer-level protocol for several years now (once they pulled
it from the iPod, I
knew something was up), so although I'm a
little
surprised to see even a FW400 option gone
from the MB, I kind
of figured it would happen sooner or later.
Another controversial change has been the new trackpad. Some
people are complaining that it clikcs too loudly, or that it
doesn't register clicks sometimes, or that it's just odd having
a trackpad without a button. Though it did take a bit of getting
used to, it's now one of my favorite things about the machine.
Mine registers clicks perfectly well most of the time (as well
as any of the previous-gen MBPs I've used – in fact the only
thing I've used that's got a more reliable button is Sparky)
and my click sound is no louder than any other button I've
ever used. Mileage may vary, of course, but I simply haven't
noticed anything to grouse about regarding the trackpad.
The glass screen, however, is a different matter. As has
been noted, it's glossy. Very glossy. Reflective. Under most
circumstances, this isn't problematic, but there are times...
I don't like reflections on my screens. They're distracting
and they get in the way of seeing what's on the display. The
glass probably increases the contrast (and it certainly gives
it that "shiny, new" look) but that's much less important to
me than displaying accurate color. I don't expect any built-in
display to match my calibrated LaCie screen, but one of the
things I really like about matte screens is that they seem
to better represent print on paper by being slightly more diffuse.
The other thing I like about them is the lack of reflections.
When I first bought the MBP I didn't consider the glossy display
was going to be very problematic, but I have come to the conclusion
that it's more of a flaw than a benefit and I really wish I'd
had the option of a matte screen. It's no game-breaker, by
any stretch (as I say, under most conidtions, it's a non-issue)
but matte would be better, hands-down.
I may wind up trying out one or more of the matte-finish screen
overlaysonce companies that make such things catch up to the
new screen size and shape. I'll report back if I find anything
useful.
At any rate, the short of it is that the new MacBook Pro is
just about the (nearly) perfect machine for me. Power and portability
in a ridiculously good-looking package.
JUST
A QUICK DOODLE
|
saturday,
1 november 2008
|

THOUGHTS
ON THE NEW MACBOOK/PROS
|
tuesday,
14 october 2008
|
First off, I think they're brilliant.
There are things I'd
like to see, or think I will miss (I fully intend to acquire
one of the Pros - it will complement my
new LaCie
324 monitor nicely).
First off, just to get it out
of the way, the glossy-only option I find rather suspect.
I'm willing to be convinced,
but for
design and illustration work, I'm inclined to expect the
non-glare screens to be less fatiguing for close work
simply because
they inherently lack the distracting reflections of glass.
It would be very nice to have a non-glare glass option.
I
can see the argument for keeping more FireWire options,
too (the new Pro only has a single FW 800 port). Personally,
the
port options closely resemble the set I'm used to (on
my beloved but now rather venerable 12" PowerBook G4) – two
USBs and a FireWire (though mine's a 400), but I'd think
that two FW ports (each on their own bus) would be far
more advantageous
for some pros, especially ones who work with video.
My
expectation is that Apple will likely add more ports when
they update the 17" MacBook Pro. Right now, considering
where they had to put the battery and drive (along
the whole front of the machine), which moved the optical
drive to the
right side, they had to stack all the ports on the
left (which, to my mind is a far superior arrangement anyway
- I use my
Wacom tablet pushed up against the right side of my
PowerBook
constantly) and just ran out of room on the 15.
An an
obliquely-related note, I wonder how long before Axiotron formulates a response to these new MacBooks.
I could seriously
develop some lust for a ModBook based on the new
hardware. Maybe they could even get the Bluetooth to
work :)
CREEPING
|
tuesday,
14 october 2008
|
This year has not gone exactly according to my original plan,
art-wise. I'm busy as hell with work, though, which is exactly
what I wanted, so I'm surviving well with some breathing room
for a change. The last month has been particularly insane;
the Thunderbird finally made too convincing an argument to
be
replaced so I had to buy a car. While at the same time looking
for and moving into a new apartment. One or the other would
have been enough, but woof. On the other hand I now
have a very comfortable car that's in great shape
and will last forever, and a new apartment on the Westside
of LA (smallish
and pricey, but very well--placed, and enough room to get have
a little art space).
In general, things are quite looking up. Nice change after
this summer.
Mostly what I'm doing at work is designing and laying
out comic books, doing logos for comic/movie properties, and
other production-y things. So, that's good :)
As to
the title of this post – I've been working my way through
Warcraft III again this week, in a sort of post-Blizzcon daze.
I'm impressed at how much my appreciation of the lore and
characters in World
of Warcraft has deepened since I started
playing through
it again. I'm such a noob.
UPDATE!!!!
|
thursday,
15 may 2008
|
Okay. So. Been a while. Inexcusable, I know. Except that I
have an excuse.
When I got back from Atlanta in January I did some catching
up on freelance work (including the lovely wedding portrait,
below) then I got really busy. I'd signed up with an agency
and they got me a regular gig for two months. Then that ended.
And then, I started a whole new kind of gig: doing design
and production for Platinum
Studios here in Los Angeles. Platinum makes comics
and movies.
I'll say that again so it sinks in. Platinum makes comics.
And movies.
So, this is a whole new sandbox for me to play in. Right
now I'm being the colorist on my first comic book (about
which more later) and that's keeping me very happily busy for
a couple of weeks. BUT, the very first thing they had me do
was Photoshop up a little teaser poster for a movie (still
in pre-production) of a little comic book you may have heard
of called Witchblade!
And here it is (best viewed with Safari):

Actually, this is a special full-size standee; there's also
a normal poster version that's cropped differently.Since it's
still in pre-production there's not much to tell, details-wise,
but you can go to
the website and sign up for updates.
So yeah, that was my first assignment. I'm very much looking
forward to seeing what else these guys have up their sleeves
for me to work on!
ROMANTIC
|
saturday,
26 january 2008
|
From this week, a commissioned portrait. Just in time for
Valentine's Day!

OLDER POSTS |